rafael_del nero
Java Developer

Make Java fast! Performance tuning Java

how-to
21 Sep 202313 mins
DevopsJavaSoftware Development

Learn how to optimize JVM and JIT compiler performance for better execution speed, memory usage, and resource utilization in your Java applications—and how to check your results.

Speed, fast, performance
Credit: Ollyy/Shutterstock

JVM optimization enhances the performance and efficiency of Java applications that run on the Java virtual machine. It involves techniques and strategies aimed at improving execution speed, reducing memory usage, and optimizing resource utilization.

One aspect of JVM optimization involves memory management since it includes configuring the JVM’s memory allocation settings, such as heap sizes and garbage collector parameters. The goal is to ensure efficient memory usage and minimize unnecessary object creation and memory leaks. Additionally, optimizing the JVM’s Just-in-Time (JIT) compiler is crucial.

By analyzing code patterns, identifying hotspots, and applying optimizations like inlining and loop unrolling (see below), the JIT compiler dynamically translates frequently executed bytecode into native machine code, resulting in faster execution.

Another critical aspect of JVM optimization is thread management. Efficient utilization of threads is vital for concurrent Java applications. Optimizing thread usage involves minimizing contention, reducing context switching, and effectively employing thread pooling and synchronization mechanisms.

Finally, fine-tuning JVM parameters, such as heap size and thread-stack size, can optimize the JVM’s behavior for better performance. Profiling and analysis tools are utilized to identify performance bottlenecks, hotspots, and memory issues, enabling developers to make informed optimization decisions. JVM optimization aims to achieve enhanced performance and responsiveness in Java applications by combining these techniques and continuously benchmarking and testing the application.

Optimizing the JIT compiler

Optimizing the JVM’s Just-in-Time compiler is a crucial aspect of Java performance optimization. The JIT compiler is responsible for dynamically translating frequently executed bytecode into native machine code, improving the performance of Java applications.

The JIT compiler works by analyzing the bytecode of Java methods at runtime and identifying hotspots, which are frequently executed code segments. Once it identifies a hotspot, the JIT compiler applies various optimization techniques to generate highly optimized native machine code for that code segment. Standard JIT optimization techniques include the following:

  • Inlining: The JIT compiler may decide to inline method invocations, which means replacing the method call with the actual code of the method. Inlining reduces method invocation overhead and improves execution speed by eliminating the need for a separate method call.
  • Loop unrolling: The JIT compiler may unroll loops by replicating loop iterations and reducing the number of loop control instructions. This technique reduces loop overhead and improves performance, particularly in cases where loop iterations are known or can be determined at runtime.
  • Eliminate dead code: The JIT compiler can identify and eliminate code segments that are never executed, known as dead code. Removing dead code reduces unnecessary computations and improves the overall speed of execution.
  • Constant folding: The JIT compiler evaluates and replaces constant expressions with their computed values at compile-time. Constant folding reduces the need for runtime computations and can improve performance, especially with frequently used constants.
  • Method specialization: The JIT compiler can generate specialized versions of methods based on their usage patterns. Specialized versions are optimized for specific argument types or conditions, improving performance for specific scenarios.

These are just a few examples of JIT optimizations. The JIT compiler continuously analyzes an application’s execution profile and dynamically applies optimizations to improve performance. By optimizing the JIT compiler, developers can achieve significant performance gains in Java applications running on the JVM.

Optimizing the Java garbage collector

Optimizing the Java garbage collector (GC) is an essential aspect of JVM optimization that focuses on improving memory management and reducing the impact of garbage collection on Java application performance. The garbage collector is responsible for reclaiming memory occupied by unused objects. Here are some of the ways developers can optimize garbage collection:

  • Choose the right garbage collector: The JVM offers a variety of garbage collectors that implement different garbage collection algorithms. There are Serial, Parallel, and Concurrent Mark Sweep (CMS) garbage collectors. Newer variants include G1 (Garbage-First) and ZGC (Z Garbage Collector). Each one has its strengths and weaknesses. Understanding the characteristics of your application, such as its memory-usage patterns and responsiveness requirements, will help you select the most effective garbage collector.
  • Tune GC parameters: The JVM provides configuration parameters that can be adjusted to optimize the garbage collector’s behavior. These parameters include heap size, thresholds for triggering garbage collection, and ratios for generational memory management. Tuning JVM parameters can help balance memory utilization and garbage collection overhead.
  • Generational memory management: Most garbage collectors in the JVM are generational, dividing the heap into young and old generations. Optimizing generational memory management involves adjusting the size of each generation, setting the ratio between them, and optimizing the frequency and strategy of garbage collection cycles for each generation. This helps promote efficient object allocation and short-lived object collection.
  • Minimize object creation and retention: Excessive object creation and unnecessary object retention can increase memory usage and lead to more frequent garbage collection. Optimizing object creation involves reusing objects, employing object pooling techniques, and minimizing unnecessary allocations. Reducing object retention involves identifying and eliminating memory leaks, such as unreferenced objects that are unintentionally kept alive.
  • Concurrent and parallel collection: Some garbage collectors, like CMS and G1, support concurrent and parallel garbage collection. Enabling concurrent garbage collection allows the application to run concurrently with the garbage collector, reducing pauses and improving responsiveness. Parallel garbage collection utilizes multiple threads to perform garbage collection, speeding up the process for large heaps.
  • GC logging and analysis: Monitoring and analyzing garbage collection logs and statistics can provide insight into the behavior and performance of the garbage collector. It helps identify potential bottlenecks, long pauses, or excessive memory usage. We can use this information to fine-tune garbage collection parameters and optimization strategies.

By optimizing garbage collection, developers can achieve better memory management, reduce garbage collection overhead, and improve application performance. However, it’s important to note that optimizing garbage collection is highly dependent on the specific characteristics and requirements of the application; it often involves a balance between memory utilization, responsiveness, and throughput.

Optimizing thread usage

Efficiently using threads in the JVM is crucial for achieving optimal performance and scalability in concurrent Java applications. Here are time-proven tips for efficiently utilizing threads in the JVM:

  • Minimize thread contention: Thread contention occurs when multiple threads compete for shared resources, leading to performance degradation. To minimize contention, it is essential to design thread-safe data structures and synchronization mechanisms that minimize the need for locks and reduce the duration of critical sections. Using lock-free or non-blocking algorithms can further alleviate contention by allowing threads to make progress without blocking.
  • Utilize thread pooling: Instead of explicitly creating threads for each task, thread pooling is more efficient. Thread pooling involves creating a fixed number of threads upfront and reusing them to execute tasks. This avoids the overhead of thread creation and destruction and provides better control over resource consumption. Java’s ExecutorService framework provides built-in thread pooling facilities.
  • Avoid excessive context switching: Context switching is the process of switching the CPU from one thread to another. Excessive context switching can introduce overhead and reduce performance. Using an appropriate thread pool size that matches the available CPU cores is beneficial to avoid excessive context switching. This prevents spawning too many threads and reduces the frequency of context switches. Additionally, thread-affinity techniques can help minimize context switches by binding threads to specific CPU cores.
  • Use asynchronous and non-blocking I/O: Leveraging asynchronous and non-blocking I/O operations can improve thread utilization and scalability. Instead of blocking threads while waiting for I/O operations to complete, asynchronous I/O allows threads to continue processing other tasks. This enables a single thread to handle multiple I/O operations concurrently, resulting in better resource utilization and increased application throughput.
  • Load balancing: When work can be divided into multiple tasks, distributing the workload across multiple threads or machines may improve efficiency. Load balancing ensures that each thread receives a balanced workload, maximizing resource utilization and minimizing idle time.
  • Thread synchronization and coordination: Efficient thread coordination and synchronization is critical for correct and performant concurrent programming. Utilizing higher-level synchronization primitives such as Lock and Condition objects, instead of low-level synchronized blocks, can provide more flexibility and control over thread interactions. Additionally, thread-safe collections and concurrent data structures can simplify synchronization requirements and improve performance.
  • Thread safety and immutable objects: Designing thread-safe classes and utilizing immutable objects can reduce the need for thread synchronization. Immutable objects can be safely shared among multiple threads without locks or synchronization, eliminating the risk of data races and contention.

By applying these strategies, developers can efficiently use threads in the JVM, leading to improved performance, better resource utilization, and increased scalability in concurrent Java applications.

Fine-tuning JVM parameters

Fine-tuning JVM parameters is essential for optimizing the performance and behavior of Java applications running on a Java virtual machine. Below are JVM paramers that can be optimized.

  • Heap size (-Xmx and -Xms): The heap is the memory area where Java objects are allocated and managed. The -Xmx parameter specifies the maximum heap size, while -Xms specifies the initial heap size. Fine-tuning these parameters involves adjusting them based on your application’s memory requirements. Setting the maximum heap size too low can result in frequent garbage collection and out-of-memory errors, while setting it too high can lead to excessive memory consumption. Similarly, setting the initial heap size too low may cause frequent resizing operations, which will impact performance.
  • The garbage collector: As already discussed, choosing the appropriate garbage collector for your application can significantly improve performance. For example, the Concurrent Mark Sweep collector is suitable for applications with low pause-time requirements, while the Garbage-First (G1) collector is designed for balanced throughput and pause time. Understanding your application’s behavior and requirements will help you select the most efficient garbage collector.
  • Parallelism and concurrency: The JVM provides parameters to control the level of parallelism and concurrency in your applications. For example, the -XX:ParallelGCThreads parameter sets the number of threads used for parallel garbage collection. Adjusting these parameters based on the available hardware resources can improve the efficiency of garbage collection and other parallel operations.
  • JIT compilation: The JVM’s Just-in-Time (JIT) compiler translates frequently executed bytecode into native machine code for improved performance. Fine-tuning JIT compilation parameters, such as -XX:CompileThreshold and -XX:MaxInlineSize, can influence compilation behavior. Setting appropriate thresholds and sizes based on your application’s usage patterns can optimize the JIT compilation process and improve overall execution speed.
  • Thread-stack size: Each thread in the JVM has a stack that stores method invocations and local variables. The -Xss parameter defines the thread-stack size. Adjusting the thread-stack size may impact the number of threads that can be created and the application’s memory consumption. Setting it too low may result in a StackOverflowError, while setting it too high can limit the number of threads that can be created.
  • I/O buffer size: The JVM uses a default buffer size for I/O operations. For applications that perform significant I/O, adjusting the buffer size using the -Dsun.nio.ch.maxUpdateArrayLength parameter can improve I/O performance.
  • Profiling and monitoring: Tools like Java Flight Recorder (JFR) and Java Mission Control (JMC) can provide insight into JVM behavior and performance. Analyzing metrics and profiling data can help identify areas where fine-tuning JVM parameters may be beneficial.

Optimizing JVM parameters requires careful consideration and experimentation. Benchmarking and measuring the impact of parameter adjustments is important to ensure they result in performance improvements. Additionally, it’s recommended to stay updated with the latest JVM documentation and best practices for parameter tuning, as JVM implementations and recommended practices may evolve.

Profiling and analysis tools

Profiling and analysis tools are essential for understanding a software application’s performance characteristics and behavior. They provide insight into various aspects of the application, such as CPU usage, memory consumption, thread activity, and method-level execution times. Here are some popular and commonly used tools for Java application profiling and analysis:

  • Java Flight Recorder (JFR) and JDK Mission Control (JMC): Java Flight Recorder is a lightweight, event-based profiling framework built into the JVM. It collects detailed runtime information, including method profiling, garbage collection activity, thread states, and lock contention. JDK Mission Control is a graphical tool that allows you to analyze JFR recordings. It visually represents the recorded events, allowing you to identify performance bottlenecks, memory leaks, and other issues.
  • VisualVM: A powerful profiling and analysis tool included with the Java Development Kit (JDK), VisualVM offers a range of features, including CPU profiling, memory profiling, thread analysis, and monitoring of JVM metrics. VisualVM provides a user-friendly interface to analyze and optimize the performance of Java applications. It also supports plugins and extensions for additional functionality.
  • YourKit Java Profiler: YourKit is a commercial Java profiler that offers in-depth profiling capabilities. It provides CPU and memory profiling, thread analysis, and detects performance issues, memory leaks, and contention problems. YourKit offers a feature-rich UI and supports various JVMs, application servers, and frameworks. It is widely used in enterprise environments for performance optimization.
  • JProfiler: Another commercial Java profiler that offers comprehensive profiling and analysis features, JProfiler provides CPU profiling, memory profiling, thread profiling, and detailed coverage of method-level execution times. JProfiler is used to monitor JVM internals, analyze performance bottlenecks, and optimize memory usage. It also provides integration with various IDEs and application servers.
  • Eclipse MAT (Memory Analyzer Tool): Eclipse MAT is a powerful open source tool for analyzing memory usage in Java applications. It helps identify memory leaks, analyze heap dumps, and understand object-retention patterns. MAT provides a range of features, such as leak detection, duplicate-data detection, and histogram analysis, to optimize memory consumption and resolve memory-related issues.
  • Perf: A command-line tool available on Linux systems, perf provides low-level performance monitoring and profiling. It offers CPU performance counters, hardware event-based sampling, and system-wide profiling capabilities. Perf allows you to analyze CPU usage, cache utilization, instruction-level profiling, and more. It is particularly useful for advanced performance analysis and optimization.

These tools offer various profiling and analysis capabilities, from high-level performance monitoring to low-level code profiling. They assist developers and performance engineers identify performance bottlenecks, memory leaks, thread synchronization issues, and other performance-related problems. Developers can use these tools to optimize Java application performance and resource utilization.

Conclusion

Optimizing the JVM is a critical step for improving the performance and efficiency of Java applications. Developers can maximize resource utilization and achieve better scalability by adjusting parameters such as heap size, garbage collector algorithms, thread stack size, and JIT compilation settings.

Monitoring and profiling tools like Java Flight Recorder and JDK Mission Control are essential for identifying performance bottlenecks and making informed optimization decisions. It’s important to remember that JVM optimization is not a one-size-fits-all approach, as the optimal parameter values will vary depending on the specific application, hardware configuration, and performance goals.

Thorough testing and analysis are necessary to determine the most effective JVM optimization strategies. With careful consideration and experimentation, using the techniques discussed in this article, you can harness the power of an optimized JVM and unlock the full potential of your Java applications.

rafael_del nero
Java Developer

Rafael del Nero is a Java Champion and Oracle Ace, creator of the Java Challengers initiative, and a quiz master in the Oracle Dev Gym. Rafael is the author of "Java Challengers" and "Golden Lessons." He believes there are many techniques involved in creating high-quality software that developers are often unaware of. His purpose is to help Java developers use better programming practices to code quality software for stress-free projects with fewer bugs.

More from this author

Exit mobile version